Four ways to measure US wage growth
US wage growth has four official readings and they regularly disagree by a full percentage point. The reason is not measurement error — it is that only one of them holds the mix of jobs constant.
At a glance
| Measure | Latest | Period | Published by | Frequency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Average hourly earnings, private sector | 37.75 USD/hour | Aug 2026 | Bureau of Labor Statistics | Monthly |
| Employment Cost Index, total compensation | 177.18 | Q2 2026 | Bureau of Labor Statistics | Quarterly |
| Atlanta Fed Wage Growth Tracker | 4.1% | Aug 2026 | Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta | Monthly |
| QCEW average weekly wage | 1,654 USD per week | Q1 2026 | Bureau of Labor Statistics | Quarterly |
How each one is built
- Average hourly earnings, private sector
- Method: Total payroll divided by total hours — an average, so it moves with the job mix
- Covers: All private nonfarm employees
- Released: With the jobs report, first Friday
- Employment Cost Index, total compensation
- Method: Fixed-weight index: the mix of occupations and industries is held constant
- Covers: Wages plus benefits, civilian workers
- Released: About a month after quarter end
- Atlanta Fed Wage Growth Tracker
- Method: Median pay change for the SAME individuals observed twelve months apart
- Covers: Matched individuals; also split by job switchers and stayers
- Released: Shortly after the jobs report
- QCEW average weekly wage
- Method: Near-census of employer unemployment insurance filings
- Covers: More than 95% of US jobs, including bonuses and stock exercises
- Released: About five months after quarter end
The composition trap
Average hourly earnings is an average, so it rises when low-paid jobs disappear even if no one gets a raise. That is exactly what happened in spring 2020: average hourly earnings jumped nearly 8% year on year while almost nobody received an increase, because the jobs lost were concentrated in low-wage leisure and hospitality. The ECI, which holds the job mix fixed, showed nothing like that.
The Atlanta Fed tracker avoids the trap differently: it follows the same people, so it answers "how much more is a given worker paid than a year ago". Its split between job switchers and job stayers is the clearest available evidence on how tight the labour market is, because the switcher premium widens when employers must bid workers away.
Which one to use
Use the ECI to judge inflation pressure from labour costs. It is the measure the Federal Reserve cites most often precisely because composition cannot distort it, and it includes benefits, which are a third of what employers pay.
Use the Atlanta Fed tracker for labour market tightness and for the switcher-stayer gap. Use average hourly earnings only for timeliness — it arrives first, on the first Friday of the month, and should be read as a rough signal.
Use QCEW when accuracy matters more than speed: it is a near-census rather than a survey, and it is the only one that captures bonuses and equity compensation properly. It arrives about five months late.
Frequently asked questions
- Why did average hourly earnings spike in 2020?
- Job losses were concentrated in low-paid sectors, which mechanically raised the average pay of the workers who remained. It was a composition effect, not a pay rise.
- What is the difference between the ECI and average hourly earnings?
- The ECI holds the mix of occupations and industries constant and includes benefits. Average hourly earnings is a simple average of wages that moves with the composition of employment.
- What does the Atlanta Fed Wage Growth Tracker measure?
- The median percentage change in hourly pay for individuals observed in the same month one year apart, which removes composition effects entirely.
- Which wage measure does the Federal Reserve watch?
- The Employment Cost Index is the most cited in FOMC communication, supplemented by the Atlanta Fed tracker for evidence on labour market tightness.