MacroDataHub

US Foreign Direct Investment Inflows by Direction: Debt Instruments

US Foreign Direct Investment Inflows by Direction: Debt Instruments stood at 1,412 USD million in Q2 2026, according to FED (Z.1) via FRED; BEA (International Transactions). It is one of the indicators in the Foreign direct investment in the US table (Value · Quarterly), with a complete series running from Q1 1982 to Q2 2026. The complete series with an interactive chart, free to download.

Source: FED (Z.1) via FRED; BEA (International Transactions)Last updated: Curated by Bui Thanh Phuc
Loading chart data…

This indicator in the Foreign direct investment in the US table

IndicatorQ2-2026Q1-2026Q4-2025Q3-2025Q2-2025Q1-2025Q4-2024Q3-2024Q2-2024Q1-2024
FDI flows into the United States (BEA, by direction)141,09795,08857,35482,29082,75036,29476,46267,49474,19862,436
Debt instruments1,4126,413-3,480-13,516-5,197-11,648-8,671-7,1629,876-3,242
Equity capital139,68588,67560,83495,80687,94747,94285,13374,65664,32265,678

Understanding US Foreign Direct Investment Inflows by Direction: Debt Instruments

Debt instruments in foreign direct investment inflows to the United States capture borrowing and lending transactions between cross-border parties in a direct investment relationship, such as loans, trade credit, or qualifying intercompany debt obligations. Values are reported on a net basis by direction of investment, meaning reverse flows can reduce the total. This indicator does not measure purchases of bonds outside a direct investment relationship, nor does it include equity acquisitions; therefore, it differs from the equity capital component and represents only a portion of total inflows.

Frequently asked questions

Are debt instruments here equivalent to total US foreign debt?
No, the scope is restricted to debt within direct investment relationships.
Why can debt instrument flows reverse direction rapidly?
Borrowing, debt repayment, and internal fund transfers can occur on a large scale within any given quarter.
Does a negative level imply financial distress for the recipient unit?
Not necessarily, as negative figures may simply reflect debt repayments or shifts in internal capital structuring.