Social housing units per 10,000 in Lot, France
Social housing units per 10,000 in Lot, France stood at 310 Per 10,000 inhabitants in 2025, according to INSEE – Institut national de la statistique et des études économiques (BDM). It is one of the indicators in the Housing stock and social housing table (Value · Annual), with a complete series running from 2012 to 2025. The complete series with an interactive chart, free to download.
This indicator in the Housing stock and social housing table
| Indicator | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Social housing units per 10,000 inhabitants | |||||||||||
| Lot | 310 | 309 | 306 | 307 | 302 | 302 | 298 | 304 | 303 | 293 | |
| Lot-et-Garonne | 351 | 351 | 350 | 348 | 342 | 341 | 339 | 310 | 303 | 301 |
Understanding social housing units per 10,000 in Lot, France
This indicator tracks the concentration of regulated affordable residential infrastructure by dividing the total count of state-subsidized rental properties by the resident population base. The data captures only institutional rental assets bound by specific income and rent-ceiling regulations, deliberately leaving out private homeownership and unassisted commercial rental units. By scaling inventory against inhabitants, the metric highlights spatial disparities in housing support programs, separating itself from financial metrics like median construction costs. Every accredited apartment managed by approved public or semi-public entities enters the calculation equally.
Interpreting the series demands an understanding of the lengthy development timelines inherent in public residential infrastructure projects. Analysts should rely on annual intervals to evaluate true structural shifts, as high-frequency tracking introduces noise without capturing meaningful changes in housing accessibility. A common pitfall involves benchmarking this localized ratio against national averages without accounting for distinct rural or urban migration patterns that affect the denominator. Historical comparisons should be approached cautiously if administrative definitions regarding which properties qualify as socially managed have undergone regulatory overhaul.
Frequently asked questions
- Are cooperative housing units included alongside standard public rental properties?
- Only cooperatives that meet specific regulatory affordability and state oversight criteria are factored into the count.
- Why is it misleading to compare this ratio directly with raw building permit statistics?
- Permits measure future intended construction without adjusting for population size or distinguishing between private and subsidized builds.
- Do historical revisions affect the entire back-series or only recent estimates?
- Revisions can retroactively alter past data when population censuses are recalibrated or administrative registries are cleaned.