MacroDataHub

Lower Saxony's share of Germany's GDP

Lower Saxony's share of Germany's GDP stood at 8.94% in 2025, according to Working Group Regional Accounts of the Federal States (Arbeitskreis VGR der Länder), Statistical Offices of the Federation and the Länder. It is one of the indicators in the GDP by federal state table (Value · Annual), with a complete series running from 1991 to 2025. The complete series with an interactive chart, free to download.

Loading chart data…

This indicator in the GDP by federal state table

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
Share of German GDP
Lower Saxony8.948.98.768.718.748.898.98.868.788.95
North Rhine-Westphalia20.3520.3220.3520.3920.6420.820.7120.8920.8520.83

Understanding lower Saxony's share of Germany's GDP

Derived by comparing Lower Saxony's unadjusted nominal gross value added to the federal total, this series pinpoints the state's weight within the broader national economy. The calculation captures market and non-market production generated strictly within the state's geographic boundaries, incorporating manufacturing, services, and agricultural output valued at current prices. By presenting the figures as a proportion rather than a raw currency level, the data filters out country-wide economic cycles and uniform currency depreciation. This isolates the state's idiosyncratic industrial performance relative to sibling territories. The methodology ensures that production is credited to the location of the enterprise or local unit, rather than where the respective workers reside.

Analysts parsing these annual figures should prioritise long-term trajectory over isolated year-on-year movements, as short-term fluctuations in regional output shares are frequently smoothed during later data reconciliation phases. The release calendar dictates that early regional estimates rely heavily on partial indicators and employment statistics, with more robust administrative data integrated during subsequent benchmark revisions. Since the frequency is annual, seasonal adjustment techniques are unnecessary, though variations in the number of working days can sporadically influence the underlying production volumes. Comparisons with per capita metrics are ill-advised, as this aggregate share does not adjust for demographic disparities, population movements, or cross-border commuter flows which might otherwise skew interpretations of underlying economic vitality.

Frequently asked questions

Is the underlying production measured in real terms?
The share is derived from current price estimates, inherently capturing both volume changes and local price dynamics.
How does population size affect this measure?
While a larger workforce naturally contributes to higher total output, this specific metric does not standardise the results per resident or employee.
Do federal subsidies alter the state's proportion?
Only direct production subsidies that affect basic prices are integrated into the underlying gross value added calculation.

You may also be interested in