France maize crop condition in Bourgogne-Franche-Comté: poor
France maize crop condition in Bourgogne-Franche-Comté: poor stood at 35.5 % of area on Oct 11, 2026, according to FranceAgriMer – Céré'Obs, état des cultures de maïs grain (hebdomadaire). It is one of the indicators in the Crop conditions (Céré'Obs) table (Value · Daily), with a complete series running from Apr 12, 2015 to Oct 11, 2026. The complete series with an interactive chart, free to download.
This indicator in the Crop conditions (Céré'Obs) table
| Indicator | 11-10-2026 | 04-10-2026 | 27-09-2026 | 20-09-2026 | 13-09-2026 | 06-09-2026 | 30-08-2026 | 23-08-2026 | 16-08-2026 | 09-08-2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bourgogne-Franche-Comté | |||||||||||
| Poor | 35.5 | 35.5 | 35.5 | 35.5 | 35.37 | 35.37 | 37.04 | 37.04 | 37.04 | 39.07 | |
| Fairly good | 16.78 | 16.78 | 16.78 | 16.78 | 16.78 | 16.78 | 20.97 | 20.97 | 22.51 | 24.66 |
Understanding france maize crop condition in Bourgogne-Franche-Comté: poor
The local monitoring measure quantifies the proportion of maize cultivation area exhibiting notable health impairment short of complete crop failure. Field inspectors evaluate factors such as foliage discoloration, delayed maturity, and environmental stress to place specific acreage into this vulnerable classification. The data isolates moderate agricultural distress from both complete write-offs and healthier crop brackets.
Reading the series effectively demands tracking how these proportions evolve across successive reporting periods relative to typical regional weather patterns. Historical weekly comparisons offer the most honest analytical foundation, filtering out routine seasonal changes in plant appearance. Users should exercise caution when linking these percentages directly to economic loss, as moderately stressed plants frequently recover partial productivity.
Frequently asked questions
- How does this measurement differ from complete failure indicators?
- It tracks plants experiencing significant distress while maintaining survival prospects, unlike total write-off categories.
- What is the best way to benchmark these fluctuating stress percentages?
- Comparing current readings with historical averages for the same calendar week provides the most reliable context.
- Do moderate stress readings consistently translate to reduced harvest yields?
- Not always, because timely rainfall or favorable temperature adjustments can mitigate early setbacks.