MacroDataHub

France greenhouse gas emissions change on previous quarter

France greenhouse gas emissions change on previous quarter stood at -1.31% in Q1 2026, according to Eurostat – quarterly greenhouse gas emissions accounts (env_ac_aigg_q). It is one of the indicators in the Quarterly greenhouse gas emissions table (Value · Quarterly), with a complete series running from Q2 2010 to Q1 2026. The complete series with an interactive chart, free to download.

Source: Eurostat – quarterly greenhouse gas emissions accounts (env_ac_aigg_q)Last updated: Curated by Bui Thanh Phuc
Loading chart data…

This indicator in the Quarterly greenhouse gas emissions table

IndicatorQ1-2026Q4-2025Q3-2025Q2-2025Q1-2025Q4-2024Q3-2024Q2-2024Q1-2024Q4-2023
Change on previous quarter, seasonally adjusted-1.310.431.16-1.670.44-0.10.460.580.88-1.31
Change on same quarter of previous year, seasonally adjusted-1.40.35-0.19-0.881.391.830.6-1.89-4.09-4.49
Emissions per inhabitant, unadjusted1.531.541.371.411.561.541.371.431.541.52

Understanding france greenhouse gas emissions change on previous quarter

Sequential percentage shifts capture the momentum of smoothed greenhouse gas outputs by contrasting the current three-month period directly against the immediately preceding interval. By operating exclusively on seasonally adjusted data, this metric isolates the short-term expansion or contraction of carbon equivalent volumes once regular weather and calendar effects are stripped away. The calculation measures net changes stemming from shifts in industrial output, energy generation mixes, transport volumes, and household consumption patterns between adjacent quarters. It differs from year-on-year calculations by focusing strictly on immediate turning points and near-term velocity rather than twelve-month trajectories.

Reading this short-term rate requires acknowledging that minor revisions to either the current or prior quarter can disproportionately alter the resulting percentage, exaggerating apparent momentum. Because economic activities experience short-term volatility from strikes, fuel supply bottlenecks, or anomalous weather spikes that evade standard filtering, single-period movements can present false signals of structural decarbonization or resurgence. Analysts should view these sequential figures alongside broader macroeconomic activity indicators rather than treating them as definitive proof of long-term environmental policy success. Comparing this rate with longer-horizon metrics helps filter out the inherent noise associated with high-frequency administrative data collection.

Frequently asked questions

What does a positive sequential rate indicate?
It signals an increase in smoothed emission volumes compared strictly to the previous three-month period.
Why can single-quarter figures be misleading?
Short-term disruptions and minor baseline revisions can create exaggerated swings in the calculated percentage.
How does this differ from annual percentage comparisons?
This measure focuses on immediate near-term velocity rather than twelve-month cumulative trajectories.

You may also be interested in