MacroDataHub

France derivative liability position to capital

France derivative liability position to capital stood at 128.25% in Q1 2026, according to IMF – Financial Soundness Indicators (FSIC), data reported by Banque de France. It is one of the indicators in the Financial soundness indicators table (Value · Quarterly), with a complete series running from Q4 2008 to Q1 2026. The complete series with an interactive chart, free to download.

Source: IMF – Financial Soundness Indicators (FSIC), data reported by Banque de FranceLast updated: Curated by Bui Thanh Phuc
Loading chart data…

This indicator in the Financial soundness indicators table

IndicatorQ1-2026Q4-2025Q3-2025Q2-2025Q1-2025Q4-2024Q3-2024Q2-2024Q1-2024Q4-2023
Liquidity and market risk of deposit takers
Gross liability position in financial derivatives to capital128.25114.82116.75123.94113.91132.19123.67123.05122.86129.65
Liquidity coverage ratio143.23143.47146.2145.81144.32144.98146.5148.04151.17151.61

Understanding france derivative liability position to capital

The scale of potential obligations arising from financial derivative portfolios is evaluated by comparing the gross negative market value of outstanding derivative contracts against the total regulatory capital of deposit takers. The numerator captures all derivative instruments exhibiting a negative replacement cost or market value prior to applying master netting agreements or collateral pledges. The denominator reflects total regulatory capital. Excluded from the numerator are derivative contracts with positive market values, while capital instruments that do not qualify under regulatory definitions are omitted from the denominator.

When examining this liability indicator, analysts must account for the fact that gross liability figures do not reflect collateral posted by the reporting institution or the mitigating effects of netting agreements that offset negative values against positive claims. High ratios indicate substantial participation in over-the-counter or exchange-traded derivative markets relative to loss-absorbing capital cushions. Comparisons over time should focus on structural changes in trading book strategies rather than short-term market price movements, though sharp macroeconomic shifts can cause wide quarterly swings in derivative valuations.

Frequently asked questions

Are collateral pledges factored into the gross liability numerator?
No, this gross measure evaluates replacement cost liabilities prior to deducting collateral posted to counterparties.
How do master netting agreements impact this series?
Netting agreements reduce actual credit exposure, but gross liability reporting presents the unnetted sum of negative contract values.
What capital definition is utilized in the denominator?
The calculation relies on total qualifying regulatory capital as defined by banking supervisory frameworks.

You may also be interested in