France CIF imports incl. DOM: Afghanistan (collection data)
France CIF imports incl. DOM: Afghanistan (collection data) stood at 0 EUR million in Aug 2026, according to INSEE – Institut national de la statistique et des études économiques (BDM). It is one of the indicators in the Trade by partner country table (Value · Monthly), with a complete series running from Jan 2016 to Aug 2026. The complete series with an interactive chart, free to download.
This indicator in the Trade by partner country table
| Indicator | 08-2026 | 07-2026 | 06-2026 | 05-2026 | 04-2026 | 03-2026 | 02-2026 | 01-2026 | 12-2025 | 11-2025 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Countries | |||||||||||
| CIF imports of France incl. overseas departments - From: Afghanistan - Data of collection - NAF rev. 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| CIF imports of France incl. overseas departments - From: Bangladesh - Data of collection - NAF rev. 2 | 331 | 370 | 333 | 293 | 303 | 337 | 256 | 301 | 371 | 290 |
Understanding france CIF imports incl. DOM: Afghanistan (collection data)
Administrative collection records compiling physical merchandise entering domestic customs territory from Afghanistan quantify the financial value assigned to inbound commodity shipments. This metric incorporates the cost of insurance and freight alongside the base price of the goods, covering tangible products cleared through customs procedures under industrial classification standards. Unlike aggregate trade measures summing all trading partners or regional groupings, this specific series isolates bilateral inflows exclusively originating from a single designated nation. Goods in transit, unrecorded informal trade, and services are strictly excluded from the merchandise valuation, focusing purely on cross-border material exchanges captured at the moment of customs clearance.
Interpreting these figures requires careful attention to potential collection timing shifts and regular administrative revisions that adjust early provisional estimates as more complete documentation becomes available. Analysts should evaluate year-on-year comparisons rather than sequential monthly movements to account for recurring weather-related or logistical disruptions that influence shipping schedules. A common pitfall involves confusing collection data, which records transactions based on when administrative forms are processed, with data compiled by physical movement dates. Changes in classification frameworks can also create structural breaks, meaning historical comparisons demand caution when methodology shifts occur over longer horizons.
Frequently asked questions
- What cost components are included in this import series?
- The metric incorporates the cost of the goods plus insurance and freight charges incurred up to the point of entry.
- Why might early estimates for this trade partner be revised?
- Initial figures are provisional and get adjusted as late customs declarations and delayed administrative paperwork are processed.
- Does this series track trade in services with this partner?
- No, the dataset exclusively covers physical merchandise trade and excludes all cross-border services.